🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in other EU countries